Heimdal Security Blog

8 Best CrowdStrike Competitors & Alternatives in 2024 [Features, Pricing & Reviews]

CrowdStrike is pretty reliable when it comes to protecting you from attacks.

But the thing is, it can be quite challenging to use and almost impossible to tweak to your specific needs.

So, if you’re looking for effective protection, keep on reading to find out which cybersecurity software is the perfect fit for your needs.

Key Points

1. Heimdal®

Heimdal® is the best CrowdStrike alternative if you want to replace CrowdStrike’s heavy configuration with one seamless command and control platform.

CrowdStrike competitor, Heimdal® offers an award-winning lineup (10+ fully integrated cybersecurity solutions).

This will help  you cover everything in your IT setup, making sure you can stay proactive, whether you’re working remotely or on-site

Heimdal® is the best alternative to CrowdStrike if you’re looking for:

What do our customers say?

It is a very able protection software at a very reasonable price. I don’t know any other option of the market that offers so much at this cost.

Iván C.  CEO

– SourceForge –

Excellent experience so far. I have been recommending Heimdal® to people for years now. Shame I wasn’t signed up as an affiliate.

Mike H.  MD

– SourceForge –

During Lockdown, we evaluated our entire Security Stack. We installed different AV products onto a Virtual Machine and tried to infect them with Ransomware. Heimdal® blocked everything.

Robert B.  Managing Director

– SourceForge –

When our license expired for the expired antivirus solution that we were using from one of your competitors, the third-party IT consulting company that we employ, Extri:Co, recommended that we make the switch to Heimdal®’s services instead because it was a better fit for our infrastructure.

This was back in 2017, and we now benefit from the capabilities of multiple Heimdal® products that have beautifully rounded out our cybersecurity strategy.

Jonas Kjær Chief of IT Operations at Davidsens

– Case Study –

Heimdal® Pros

Heimdal® pricing

Our pricing model is regarded as competitive, delivering good value while providing a wide range of security features. Our solution allows you to consolidate up to seven providers into a single platform while streamlining your IT infrastructure and reducing risk.

Cons

2. Carbon Black

Carbon Black comes with a signature-based AV engine, which is pretty handy, however, there can be some inconsistencies between the on-premises and cloud versions.

You might encounter differences in feature availability, macOS support, and Linux distro support. So, make sure to be aware of those variations.

When it comes to independent public tests, this tool’s participation is a bit limited. It doesn’t quite get as involved as some other CrowdStrike alternatives.

Threat intelligence is also a bit restricted. The focus is mainly on reputation and lists of indicators for watch lists, rather than comprehensive open-source intelligence.

And one last thing to note is that this tool’s approach is more about validating and triaging detected threats, rather than actively hunting down threats proactively. For additional insights, read the CrowdStrike vs Carbon Black comparison article.

Main Features

Pricing

Carbon Black Pros

+ Customer interactive intuitive interface and easy handling through user savvy features.

The Antivirus is embedded with advanced security features which provide 24/7 workload protection from threats and all kinds of endpoints.

Next-gen AI-powered advanced security solution for businesses at the most affordable price and reduced cost.

It is globally accepted due to its easy and customer-friendly features. Very stable software can integrate with all kinds of portals and IT systems without any issues.

Shyiam Lan N, Management Consulting.

Carbon Black Cons

This tool really requires lot of customisation to be user friendly and should compatible with Microsoft operating systems, also lack of Dashboard is another major issue.

Shyiam Lan N, Management Consulting.

3. SentinelOne

Unlike other companies like CrowdStrike, the deployment process for this platform can be quite burdensome and time-consuming.

To get the full functionality, you’ll need to deal with multiple heavy agents, go through reboots during deployment, and manually handle exclusions due to software compatibility issues.

Plus, there’s no automatic sensor update feature, which can add to the workload.

They use automation and AI, but mostly at the sensor level, just like traditional AV. The problem is, that they can’t apply it across the entire system and platform.

Because of this limitation, they can’t automatically connect and analyze detections from various data sources in the cloud, which holds back their true XDR capabilities.

Main Features

Pricing

SentinelOne Pros

+ Agent install – deployed to a PC – reboot and it’s working. Web console filtering allows identification of incidents and configuration in a fairly simple manner.

Dean R., Group Infrastructure Specialist

SentinelOne Cons

Some upgrades of the product have introduced major issues. eg One release broke some OS upgrades on certain models of laptop leaving them unable to boot. Another version introduced crippling speed issues with Adobe products. To their credit they do eventually fix these issues, but not quickly enough.”

Dean R., Group Infrastructure Specialist

4. Cylance by Blackberry Security

The focus of BlackBerry Guard is on threat monitoring and triage services.

But they don’t have proactive threat hunting led by humans. Instead, their threat hunting is limited to custom detections within the product.

Another thing to keep in mind is that they don’t provide integrated open-source intelligence.

They don’t handle tasks like managing policies, remediating hosts, or offering any warranties.

When it comes to independent public tests, BlackBerry Guard doesn’t participate in most of them.

So, their performance in those tests might not be as clear as some other companies like CrowdStrike.

Main Features

Pricing

While some people think it is pricey, others think it is worth the money. 

Cylance Pros

+ In the three years we’ve been protecting our endpoints with CylancePROTECT, we have had ZERO incidents across ~250 endpoints.

I have tested the Cylance client against true zero day attacks, not recognized on VirusTotal, shared with me by an MSP friend.

He has had many clients compromised by ransomware, several more than once, with nuke/pave/restore for the entire organization being the typical response.

When I throw attacks against old-build agents, and those attacks are obliterated, it helps me sleep better at night.

I don’t see these attacks in my environment, hence the testing.

The endpoint is the focus of the last line of defense, so PROTECT is critical in my security posture.

Brian F., IT Manager

Cylance Cons

Some times results in false positive for the script module and could get tricky to manage exceptions if one is not fully aware of the gaps they can introduce by simply whitelisting system paths where most malware run.

Could include real-time sandbox capabilities like other competing products in the market.

Udhayasimha P., Senior Information Security Specialist

5. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Defender for Endpoint isn’t a separate product; it’s a built-in feature of Windows OS, and it changes with each edition and version of Windows.

So, to get all the full functionality, you need to run the current version and premium edition of Windows OS.

The security is tightly linked to the OS management process. And that means maintenance can be a bit tricky.

For annual OS feature updates and monthly AV engine platform updates, device reboots are required. On top of that, there’s an additional daily signature update.

The detection capabilities mainly rely on the old-school signature-based AV, and they need daily updates to stay up-to-date with the latest protections.

Main Features

Pricing

Microsoft Pros

+ The wealth of detail the product provides in the security.microsoft portal is impressive, as well as the ability to take action on most alerts, identities and hosts whenever I have the correct RBAC security roles activated.

Anonymous, Senior Security Engineer

Microsoft Cons

You cannot install Microsoft Defender for Endpoint on all devices. I think you can only use it on macOS and Windows 10 at the moment, which leads to limitations when using mobile or other devices. It also tends to slow other programs, especially when scanning. It might also seem complicated for starters.

Lena J B, Program Coordinator

6. Symantec

This security system uses multiple agents, and they’re all managed through different consoles. Some are local, some are in the cloud, and some are in a mix of both.

When it comes to protection, they still rely on traditional methods like signatures and scans, unlike other CrowdStrike competitors.

It gives you basic information about blocked files, but the context around the threat is pretty limited.

If you want more visibility into the threats, you’ll need to get an additional product called Symantec EDR (it’s not all included in the base package).

The remote response feature also requires yet another product: Symantec EDR. So, it’s not all in one place.

To get the full capabilities, you’ll need two more products: Symantec EDR and Symantec DeepSight Intelligence

A negative aspect of Symantec is that the management console is slow and difficult to use.

It is also hard to configure, and the solution has become less effective over time.

Main Features

Pricing

Symantec Pros

+ Generally, this item has functioned admirably, albeit a digit swelled, for the two servers and client machines.

Programmed protection without client intercession.

This software helps our test clients and designers stay away from any external or internal security worries while simultaneously furnishing quick recuperation with mechanization. I

t has helped us a ton to acquire clients in the business. We like the arrangement since it is exceptionally natural, cloud-oversaw, and simple to introduce.

The administration and scientific representation you give us are extremely useful in moderating a danger.

Kiara A., Marketing Content Manager

Symantec Cons

We have been involved in this item for a long time.

Since going to Broadcom, both help and item usefulness have tumbled off radically.

Clients appear to be very asset (memory) concentrated and earn a lot of grievances from our client base.

A fragile client, in the event of defilement, drives you to reinstall the PC. Moderately new and not incorporated with all designated spot items. Application and URL filtering highlights do not fulfill us that much.

Kiara A., Marketing Content Manager

7. Trellix Endpoint Security

When it comes to installing Endpoints, you might need to reboot your devices, and for some features, you’ll need on-premises infrastructure.

The full functionality requires using multiple separate consoles, each with its update process for former McAfee and FireEye products.

There have been some performance issues with Trellix, and its agent can be quite heavy.

The way it detects threats relies mainly on old-fashioned signatures, which can leave you exposed to new and unseen threats. Also, the platform’s behavioral protection isn’t very robust, which can be a concern.

For Mac and Linux users, the ML capabilities are lacking, and the capabilities across different operating systems aren’t consistent.

Another thing to consider is that EDR data is stored on the sensor, which means the platform needs to reach out to the endpoint to get full information.

This can limit visibility when endpoints are offline, making it difficult to hunt for threats and investigate alerts.

When it comes to threat intelligence, the platform only has a known database of hashes and IPs. There’s no threat attribution or adversary tactic discovery, and it doesn’t offer automated malware sandboxing.

Also, the platform doesn’t have in-house services for MDR (Managed Detection and Response), managed threat hunting, or hands-on remediation.

Main Features

Pricing

Trellix Pros

+ Trellix is a product with long history inherited from Mcaffee.

You can see this when using the software as it has all security components and functions you could imagine, and it provides complexed endpoint security.

The modules are very well integrated with each other which works very good in case some threats are present in the environment.

Przemek P., Infrastructure Specialist Lead.

Trellix Cons

As I am also responsible for preparation of the product for installation and installation on end machines, I have struggled few times to do my job.

I have faced issues with configuration, updates and installation.

However, none of these issues stopped me from finishing my tasks but were just obstacles on my way.

Thanks to good documentation and vendor support all problem were quickly resolved.

Przemek P., Infrastructure Specialist Lead.

8. Sophos

They offer protection technologies that disrupt the entire attack chain, including deep learning capabilities that proactively predict and prevent attacks.

The reviews show that customers are dissatisfied with the support service and the amount of time it takes to resolve the issues they are having.

Main Features

Pricing

Sophos Pros

+ We have been using Sophos in our company for ensuring data and network protection.

Our system administrators find it easy to use, customizable, and powerful enough to catch any rogue device or threats.

The built-in reporting and logging system is very useful to allow the administrators know exactly everything that’s happening, and it is best presented using easy to read graphs, and daily summaries.

We’ve tried their competitor and it seems to us that Sophos is more optimized and works much faster using the same hardware.

Clarwin C, IT Services Manager

Sophos Cons

When it comes to complex networks, I have seen this product failing haplessly especially when it comes to routing protocols -URL filtering just works but doesn’t always behave as it ideally should behave especially when TLS/SSL is used. -Few advanced features (such as vpn with overlapping subnets) that aren’t supported with this box -Granular control over the applications is missing too; I believe this has to be accomplished masterly as nowadays there is very high risk of layer 7 attacks such as ransomware.

Tejas P., Technical Consultant

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Who is CrowdStrike biggest competitor?

Among the competitors in the Endpoint Protection category, Crowdstrike’s top three rivals are McAfee ePO, holding 25.45% market share, followed by Duo Security at 7.89%, and SentinelOne with 7.79% market share.

Is CrowdStrike overpriced?

When examining various traditional valuation multiples, CrowdStrike is significantly overvalued, particularly when compared to the overall information technology sector.

Is SentinelOne better than CrowdStrike?

According to verified reviews from actual users within the Managed Detection and Response Services market, CrowdStrike boasts a rating of 4.8 stars, derived from 118 reviews.

In close competition, SentinelOne receives a high rating of 4.7 stars, based on 248 reviews.

What are the top countries that use Crowdstrike?

As of 2024, Crowdstrike has witnessed a remarkable global adoption, with over 2902 companies utilizing it as their preferred endpoint protection tool.

A significant majority of these companies, accounting for 62.72% of Crowdstrike’s customer base, are based in the United States, totaling 1901 customers.

Additionally, other leading countries utilizing Crowdstrike include the United Kingdom with 184 customers (6.07%), and Australia with 164 customers (5.41%).

What is better than CrowdStrike?

Explore the available options above to gain valuable insights.

By examining reviewer data, you can assess how CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Protection Platform compares to its competitors.

Delve into reviews from both current and previous users across diverse industries such as Information Technology and Services, Computer & Network Security, and Financial Services.

This thorough evaluation will help you discover the most suitable product for your business.